Studio

Ask in plain language. Get a document you can defend.

You describe the document you need in plain language. A planner negotiates the scope with you (entities, period, angle), then checks the dataset is actually rich enough to answer before a single word is written. If it is not, Studio says so, rather than inventing a confident page. Generation then runs as retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) over a curated LAI corpus, so every sentence is grounded in a retrieved, cited source rather than free-written. The result is a PDF or slide deck with a sourced annex behind every claim.

From a plain-language request to a sourced document

Three steps, the way you would brief an analyst:

• Describe. Ask for the document in natural language, the way you would brief a colleague.
• Scope & check. The planner sets the exact scope and verifies the dataset covers it, honestly flagging any gap.
• Generate. A sourced PDF or slide deck, with every figure and quote traceable to its origin.

Two output families: Briefs (one entity or one question, 1 to 10 pages) and Reports (multi-entity, thematic, 20 to 50 pages).

What your team does with it

Why you can trust what you read

• A completeness gate that refuses to fabricate if the dataset is thin on your scope, Studio tells you instead of guessing.
• Every claim links back to its source the document holds up under questioning, in a board room or an investment committee.
• The same numbers as Atlas one source of truth, no conflicting figures across your tools.
• Grounded, not free-generated retrieval-augmented (RAG) over a curated LAI corpus and the analyst’s ontology, so every passage traces to a real source.